Shafa Orthopedic Journal

Published by: Kowsar

A Comparative Evaluation of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty via Lateral and Posterolateral Approaches

Kaveh Gharanizade 1 , Hossein Karimi Heris 1 , * , Mansour Abolghasemian 1 , Samad Joudi 1 , Payam Hassany Shariat Panahy 2 and Amin Yoosefzadeh 1
Authors Information
1 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology University of Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Article information
  • Shafa Orthopedic Journal: February 28, 2016, 3 (1); e3901
  • Published Online: February 20, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: August 25, 2015
  • Revised: November 1, 2015
  • Accepted: January 22, 2016
  • DOI: 10.17795/soj-3901

To Cite: Gharanizade K, Karimi Heris H, Abolghasemian M, Joudi S, Hassany Shariat Panahy P, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty via Lateral and Posterolateral Approaches, Shafa Ortho J. 2016 ;3(1):e3901. doi: 10.17795/soj-3901.

Abstract
Copyright: Copyright © 0, Shafa Orthopedic Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Chen YL, Lin T, Liu A, Shi MM, Hu B, Shi ZL, et al. Does hydroxyapatite coating have no advantage over porous coating in primary total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10: 21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011; 12(3): 123-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Goosen JH, Kollen BJ, Castelein RM, Kuipers BM, Verheyen CC. Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(1): 200-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Amlie E, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Baste V, Nordsletten L, Hovik O, et al. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop. 2014; 85(5): 463-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. McBryde CW, Revell MP, Thomas AM, Treacy RB, Pynsent PB. The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(4): 920-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Lombardi AV, Berend KR. Direct Lateral. Surg Treat Hip Arthritis Reconstr Replace Revis. 2009; : 272-7
  • 7. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in adults: II. Arthroplasty options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002; 10(5): 334-44[PubMed]
  • 8. Meneghini RM, Smits SA, Swinford RR, Bahamonde RE. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(6 Suppl 1): 68-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Van Dijk CM, Bimmel R, Haddad FS. (iv) Surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty–pros and cons. Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23(1): 27-34
  • 10. Kiyama T, Naito M, Shinoda T, Maeyama A. Hip abductor strengths after total hip arthroplasty via the lateral and posterolateral approaches. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(1): 76-80[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F, Bensafi H, Puget J. Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop. 2007; 31(5): 597-603[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Soreide JA. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty--does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2007; 78(6): 719-29[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Hedlundh U, Hybbinette CH, Fredin H. Influence of surgical approach on dislocations after Charnley hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10(5): 609-14[PubMed]
  • 14. Judet R, Judet J. Technique and results with the acrylic femoral head prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1952; 34-B(2): 173-80[PubMed]
  • 15. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 453: 293-8[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader