Shafa Orthopedic Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of Dorr Classification in Proximal Femur Morphology

Farid Najd Mazhar 1 , Davod Jafari 1 , Marzieh Nojoomi 2 , Alireza Mirzaei 1 , * and Hamed Tayebi 1
Authors Information
1 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Shafa Orthopedic Journal: February 2018, 5 (1); e64801
  • Published Online: February 17, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 9, 2017
  • Revised: January 22, 2018
  • Accepted: January 23, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/soj.64801

To Cite: Najd Mazhar F, Jafari D, Nojoomi M, Mirzaei A, Tayebi H. et al. Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of Dorr Classification in Proximal Femur Morphology, Shafa Ortho J. 2018 ;5(1):e64801. doi: 10.5812/soj.64801.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Shafa Orthopedic Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
References
  • 1. Audige L, Bhandari M, Hanson B, Kellam J. A concept for the validation of fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(6):401-6. [PubMed: 16003200].
  • 2. Mears SC. Management of Severe Osteoporosis in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Curr Translat Geriatrics Exp Gerontol Rep. 2013;2(2):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s13670-013-0044-7.
  • 3. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14(3):231-42. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2.
  • 4. Marya SKS, Bawari RK. Total Hip Replacement Surgery: Principles and Techniques. JP Medical Ltd; 2010.
  • 5. Jennings JM, Thiele RAR, Krynetskiy E, Wellman SS, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP. ndependent Analysis of the Dorr Classification of. Proximal Femoral Morphology: A Reliability Study. Duke Orthop J. 2016;6(1):12-6.
  • 6. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82. [PubMed: 23092060].
  • 7. Ackermann C, Lam Q, Linder P, Kull C. Problems in classification of fractures of the proximal humerus. Zeitschrift fur Unfallchirurgie, Versicherungsmedizin und Berufskrankheiten. 1986;79(4):209.
  • 8. Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Esdaile J, Duncan CP. Classification systems in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10(4):290-7. [PubMed: 15089078].
  • 9. Brien H, Noftall F, MacMaster S, Cummings T, Landells C, Rockwood P. Neer's Classification System. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care. 1995;38(2):257-60. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199502000-00022.
  • 10. Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, Koval K, Cuomo F, Schoenberg N. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75(12):1745-50. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199312000-00002.
  • 11. Naqvi SG, Reynolds T, Kitsis C. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Fernandez classification for distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34(4):483-5. doi: 10.1177/1753193408101667. [PubMed: 19321533].
  • 12. Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B. Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporosis Int. 2011;22(10):2575-86. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1596-z.
  • 13. Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR, Earl SC, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, et al. Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis Int. 2011;22(5):1277-88. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1601-6.
  • 14. Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper C. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporosis Int. 2012;23(9):2239-56. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3.
  • 15. Blomfeldt R. Comparison of Internal Fixation with Total Hip Replacement for Displaced Femoral Neck FracturesRandomized, Controlled Trial Performed at Four Years. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87(8):1680. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.d.02655.
  • 16. Hedbeck CJ, Enocson A, Lapidus G, Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, et al. Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty with Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93(5):445-50. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.j.00474.
  • 17. Ahlborg H, Johnell O, Karlsson M. An age-related medullary expansion can have implications for the long-term fixation of hip prostheses. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2009;75(2):154-9. doi: 10.1080/00016470412331294405.
  • 18. Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O’Byrne JM. Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthoped Rev. 2013;5(1):8. doi: 10.4081/or.2013.e8.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments